<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter the Digg Killer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/</link>
	<description>Now New and Improved</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: digijustin</title>
		<link>http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>digijustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digijustin.com/?p=129#comment-122</guid>
		<description>The only thing that I have against using Twitter for the same thing I used to use Digg for is that my stream moves a lot faster in Twitter and I do miss a lot.  I use Tweetdeck to group a lot but some stuff still gets missed.  But Digg is one of those sites that just a year ago I couldn&#039;t imagine life without and now I never check it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing that I have against using Twitter for the same thing I used to use Digg for is that my stream moves a lot faster in Twitter and I do miss a lot.  I use Tweetdeck to group a lot but some stuff still gets missed.  But Digg is one of those sites that just a year ago I couldn&#39;t imagine life without and now I never check it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Hurst</title>
		<link>http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digijustin.com/?p=129#comment-121</guid>
		<description>I never thought about it that way, but I completely agree. Twitter, because you follow who you want, is also a MUCH better filter than Digg. Masses of people, especially on the internet, are extremely stupid. Digg also has a higher rate of retard internet dweebs, while Twitter requires that you be able to carry on something of a convo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So...yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought about it that way, but I completely agree. Twitter, because you follow who you want, is also a MUCH better filter than Digg. Masses of people, especially on the internet, are extremely stupid. Digg also has a higher rate of retard internet dweebs, while Twitter requires that you be able to carry on something of a convo.</p>
<p>So&#8230;yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: static.digijustin.com

Served from: digijustin.com @ 2012-02-10 02:39:34 -->
