Comments on: Is Twitter the Digg Killer? http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/ My Thoughts and Other Things Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:44:39 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: digijustin http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-183 digijustin Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:14:52 +0000 http://digijustin.com/?p=129#comment-183 The only thing that I have against using Twitter for the same thing I used to use Digg for is that my stream moves a lot faster in Twitter and I do miss a lot. I use Tweetdeck to group a lot but some stuff still gets missed. But Digg is one of those sites that just a year ago I couldn't imagine life without and now I never check it. The only thing that I have against using Twitter for the same thing I used to use Digg for is that my stream moves a lot faster in Twitter and I do miss a lot. I use Tweetdeck to group a lot but some stuff still gets missed. But Digg is one of those sites that just a year ago I couldn't imagine life without and now I never check it.

]]> By: Tyler Hurst http://digijustin.com/2009/02/11/is-twitter-the-digg-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-116 Tyler Hurst Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:30:10 +0000 http://digijustin.com/?p=129#comment-116 I never thought about it that way, but I completely agree. Twitter, because you follow who you want, is also a MUCH better filter than Digg. Masses of people, especially on the internet, are extremely stupid. Digg also has a higher rate of retard internet dweebs, while Twitter requires that you be able to carry on something of a convo.<br><br>So...yes. I never thought about it that way, but I completely agree. Twitter, because you follow who you want, is also a MUCH better filter than Digg. Masses of people, especially on the internet, are extremely stupid. Digg also has a higher rate of retard internet dweebs, while Twitter requires that you be able to carry on something of a convo.

So…yes.

]]>