For the longest time, all I heard about was whether or not some up-and-coming site would be the “Digg-Killer”. And site after site failed at that. But in my mind, we’ve had it around for a while now. Twitter. At around the time I really got into Twitter, I began to cut my time with Digg. I don’t really know why. I was an avid Digg user. I used it constantly.
But as Digg began to have articles that I didn’t care about take over the front page, I grew less and less interested. But I also noticed that articles that I did care about started to show up in my Twitter stream. As I found a good group of people to follow that were interesting to me and from them, I got the news and articles that were important to me. I didn’t need Digg and all of its LOLCATS pictures that I see as a waste.
I also started to find that most of the Digg stories that I clicked on came from the same group of sites. So I just took out the middleman. I still think that Digg is a great idea but now, I know that an article is really good if it’s re-tweeted to me by multiple Twitter friends. I’ve removed the politics behind the front page of Digg by following people who I trust will submit interesting stories to me.
What do you think? Am I completely off here? I’d love to hear what you have to say.
I never thought about it that way, but I completely agree. Twitter, because you follow who you want, is also a MUCH better filter than Digg. Masses of people, especially on the internet, are extremely stupid. Digg also has a higher rate of retard internet dweebs, while Twitter requires that you be able to carry on something of a convo.
The only thing that I have against using Twitter for the same thing I used to use Digg for is that my stream moves a lot faster in Twitter and I do miss a lot. I use Tweetdeck to group a lot but some stuff still gets missed. But Digg is one of those sites that just a year ago I couldn't imagine life without and now I never check it.
2 Responses to Is Twitter the Digg Killer?
Tyler Hurst
February 11th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
I never thought about it that way, but I completely agree. Twitter, because you follow who you want, is also a MUCH better filter than Digg. Masses of people, especially on the internet, are extremely stupid. Digg also has a higher rate of retard internet dweebs, while Twitter requires that you be able to carry on something of a convo.
So…yes.
digijustin
February 23rd, 2009 at 1:14 pm
The only thing that I have against using Twitter for the same thing I used to use Digg for is that my stream moves a lot faster in Twitter and I do miss a lot. I use Tweetdeck to group a lot but some stuff still gets missed. But Digg is one of those sites that just a year ago I couldn't imagine life without and now I never check it.